Skip to main content

Using HyperCube – An AI approach to mineral exploration data integration for targeting

Traditional approaches to data integration for targeting typically focused on statistical classification models, employing numerous assumptions that are generally not met in practice. Recent, successful advances in stochastic, non-Euclidean approaches to the problem of understanding complex data relationships have been made in disciplines such as genomics and epidemiology. Predictive models are constructed from the integration of complex data sets without the limiting assumptions of traditional statistical approaches. These new approaches can easily handle continuous, discrete, noisy, and missing data without the imposition of statistical models or assumptions. In partnership with HyperCube Research, we are applying such an approach to the exploration targeting problem. The method provides a series of robust rules describing the relationship between input exploration data variables and mineral occurrences. The rules discovered are typically of much greater utility than statistical trend observations. These methods have the potential to improve discovery rates when applied as part of a carefully planned and systematic process of modelling, interpretation, and target generation.

Case study:

Using predictive modelling in mineral exploration – Mount Dore area, AU 

This approach can be applied wherever conventional Weights-of-Evidence, logistic regression, neural networks, or other data-driven approaches would be appropriate. Hypercube analyzes relationships amongst many variables simultaneously in multi-dimensional data space rather than criteria by criteria. It removes the difficulties of determining “cut-offs” or thresholds for individual exploration criteria by replacing them with more interpretively useful multi-parameter “rules” driven by geological reasoning.

A few years ago, we carried out targeting work for IOCG-style mineralisation in the Mt Dore area of QLD, Australia. We produced a 3D model and predictive exploration map using the WofE approach for this regional scale project. Using the same data sets, we tested the power of predictive analytics. The results were much more useful. In the Hypercube result, at least one cell immediately proximal to all the known mineral deposits were identified within the upper 2nd percentile of the ranked prospectivity score. HyperCube ranks criteria by creating rules, which are sets of related criteria that define a phenomenon or event. The rules generated for the Mt. Dore model revealed clearly that training cells cluster into different groups which can be tied to subtle variations in geological settings.

Figure 1: On the left side is the WofE predictive exploration map and on the right side the HyperCube map. Numbers correspond to training data (known IOCG deposits), and red zones correspond to high prospectivity target selection areas. Note that fewer training sites are identified as high prospectivity zones in the WofE result (e.g. training sites 1, 7, 11). Other case studies we have looked at demonstrate that HyperCube presents fewer false positives. The HyperCube map is simply a much more focused prospectivity map. ©2010 Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Queenland. All rights reserved

Meet the author:

John McGaughey, PhD – Founder and President at Mira Geoscience

John has extensive mining industry experience focusing on quantitative, multi-disciplinary 3D and 4D interpretation for mineral exploration and geotechnical decision support. He currently leads our technology strategy and our geotechnical business. Prior to founding Mira Geoscience in 1999, he spent 10 years at the Noranda Technology Centre as a Senior Scientist in their rock mechanics group. He obtained an MSc in geological engineering and a PhD in geophysics from Queen’s University. John is based in Montreal.

Latest news

Case studies
September, 01 2019

Machine learning in mineral exploration

We have applied machine learning as part of custom solutions to complex exploration and geotechnical problems since 2015...
Read more
September, 13 2021

Manual classifications vs Project classifications

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, There are two ways to create classifications when importing data...
Read more
November, 18 2019

Uploading multiple files

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, you can upload multiple files in one simple step...
Read more
February, 03 2019

Organizing files as data sets

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, a data set is often composed of a group of files of various formats along with metadata. These can be grouped...
Read more
May, 01 2022

Drape Voxet properties on surfaces

In GOCAD Mining Suite you can texturally drape your images and 2D gridded data onto surfaces, for example...
Read more
April, 01 2022

Visualize 3D vector properties

In GOCAD Mining Suite the normal of a surface is an example of a 3D vectorial property, where the components of the vector are...
Read more
GOCAD Mining Suite
April, 08 2021

GOCAD Mining Suite – A geological modelling powerhouse

Past event, recording link available here...
Read more
October, 11 2021

Coordinate display area

In Geoscience ANALYST you can get real-time feedback on the XYZ coordinates corresponding to the... ..
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
September, 10 2020

How to run gravity inversions in a geologically driven way

Past event, view here or on our YouTube Channel to see how to run a 3D inversion and forward modelling in Geoscience ANALYST Pro using VPmg...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
March, 11 2021

Peak finder – Geoscience ANALYST geoapps: Python application

Past event. Link to recording available here.
Read more
Blog news
December, 06 2019

Women Geoscientists in Canada

We are proud sponsors of WGC, advocates for increased gender balance within geosciences...
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services