Geophysical detection of hydrothermal alteration footprints

Presented at AEGC2018 by John McGaughey, President, Mira Geoscience

The use of geophysical data is appealing when exploring deep or under cover because, although it does not directly respond to rock chemistry, it often provides uniform areal data coverage. In deep and undercover exploration contexts, direct recognition of footprint-scale hydrothermal alteration from geophysical data is the ultimate goal of geophysical interpretation—there cannot be any expectation of a direct ore deposit signature in exploration data, and understanding footprint-scale alteration signatures can lead directly to targets.

The key to geophysical recognition of alteration at the ore system scale is the assumption, typically met in practice, that the primary control on physical property variation across the system is formational and structural, with hydrothermal alteration a contributing secondary effect. Specialized interpretation workflows, such as described in the article above, can take advantage of this assumption to create physical property models composed of primary (formational and structural) and secondary (alteration) physical property signatures that are fully consistent with geophysical data and whatever level of geological data is available. The secondary physical property signatures are, in many cases, directly interpretable in terms of hydrothermal alteration domains.

3D geological model.

Magnetic data.

Case study: The Mutooroo Iron Project area, Australia

This is a great example of developing a geologically-based magnetic model using a variety of interpretation, modelling, and inversion techniques. Due to limited constraining data on the magnetic units, construction of the starting model was based predominantly on interpretation of magnetic data. In this instance, the goal was to first develop a geologically plausible 3D representation of homogeneous magnetic domains beneath non-magnetic cover that explains the majority of the measured magnetic response. This was supported by the sparse geological data and magnetic susceptibility provided by drilling under cover. The robustness of the magnetic domains are validated by assigning a homogeneous susceptibility to each domain, forward modelling, and observing a good correlation between the predicted and measured magnetic data. A final stage of inversion to solve for local susceptibility variations within the domains highlights magnetic anomalies that may be associated with alteration and therefore become potential targets or areas of geological complexity that require further investigation. This geologically-based model, consistent with geological constraints and geophysical survey data, provides a basis for confident decision making in technical and business realms, with the ability to adapt and accommodate new and evolving information as it becomes available.

Glenn Pears – Principal Geophysicist with Mira Geoscience

Glenn joined our team a little over 15 years ago! Glenn worked closely in the above project with his colleague James Alderman. Glenn is a highly experienced geophysicist providing expertise in data integration and interpretation projects. His strengths are in geologically-constrained geophysical interpretation and inversion using GOCAD Mining Suite, data assessment, QA/QC and executing integrated interpretations.

Latest news

August, 05 2019

Colouring histograms

In GOCAD, you can colour your histogram by object, region or property...
Read more
July, 06 2020

Plotting drillhole data

While pencil crayons are still a vital part of geology, Geoscience ANALYST lets you get all your data into 3D in a convenient shareable format...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
September, 10 2020

How to run gravity inversions in a geologically driven way

Past event, view here or on our YouTube Channel to see how to run a 3D inversion and forward modelling in Geoscience ANALYST Pro using VPmg...
Read more
March, 16 2020

View neighbourhoods in 3D

You can display your neighbourhoods in Geoscience INTEGRATOR 3D viewer, making it easier to understand spatial distribution of the data.
Read more
May, 04 2020

Sneak peek v19

Emerson-Paradigm released a short video to help users become acquainted with the redesigned interface. Watch this short video ...
Read more
June, 07 2022

What’s new in Geoscience ANALYST version 4.0 – Virtual Lecture

Watch as Carla shows the new and updated tools in Geoscience ANALYST 4.0...
Read more
GOCAD Mining Suite
March, 01 2022

The value of using structural restoration tools in exploration modelling – Virtual Lecture

Watch recording - Jean-Philippe shows the use of structural restoration tools in GMS as a modelling tool for structurally controlled deposits...
Read more
June, 02 2019

Adding comments to folders and objects

In Geoscience ANALYST, text comments and website links can be added in the Data Table...
Read more
July, 15 2019

Extracting property names from a CSV

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, extract the property names directly from a CSV file to speed up the process and reduce errors...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
July, 07 2022

Inverting time domain data in Geoscience ANALYST version 4.0 – Virtual Lecture

Kristofer inverts TEM data in 1D through Geoscience ANALYST Pro Geophysics to recover conductivity in Geoscience ANALYST 4.0...
Read more
August, 08 2022

ODBC drillhole import

In Geoscience ANALYST you can import drillholes straight from your ODBC database...
Read more
Software releases
June, 28 2023

New release – Geoscience INTEGRATOR 3.9

This version includes new functionality to provide a better user experience, such as: user notifications, new display options, and more!
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services