Geophysical detection of hydrothermal alteration footprints

Presented at AEGC2018 by John McGaughey, President, Mira Geoscience

The use of geophysical data is appealing when exploring deep or under cover because, although it does not directly respond to rock chemistry, it often provides uniform areal data coverage. In deep and undercover exploration contexts, direct recognition of footprint-scale hydrothermal alteration from geophysical data is the ultimate goal of geophysical interpretation—there cannot be any expectation of a direct ore deposit signature in exploration data, and understanding footprint-scale alteration signatures can lead directly to targets.

The key to geophysical recognition of alteration at the ore system scale is the assumption, typically met in practice, that the primary control on physical property variation across the system is formational and structural, with hydrothermal alteration a contributing secondary effect. Specialized interpretation workflows, such as described in the article above, can take advantage of this assumption to create physical property models composed of primary (formational and structural) and secondary (alteration) physical property signatures that are fully consistent with geophysical data and whatever level of geological data is available. The secondary physical property signatures are, in many cases, directly interpretable in terms of hydrothermal alteration domains.

3D geological model.

Magnetic data.

Case study: The Mutooroo Iron Project area, Australia

This is a great example of developing a geologically-based magnetic model using a variety of interpretation, modelling, and inversion techniques. Due to limited constraining data on the magnetic units, construction of the starting model was based predominantly on interpretation of magnetic data. In this instance, the goal was to first develop a geologically plausible 3D representation of homogeneous magnetic domains beneath non-magnetic cover that explains the majority of the measured magnetic response. This was supported by the sparse geological data and magnetic susceptibility provided by drilling under cover. The robustness of the magnetic domains are validated by assigning a homogeneous susceptibility to each domain, forward modelling, and observing a good correlation between the predicted and measured magnetic data. A final stage of inversion to solve for local susceptibility variations within the domains highlights magnetic anomalies that may be associated with alteration and therefore become potential targets or areas of geological complexity that require further investigation. This geologically-based model, consistent with geological constraints and geophysical survey data, provides a basis for confident decision making in technical and business realms, with the ability to adapt and accommodate new and evolving information as it becomes available.

Glenn Pears – Principal Geophysicist with Mira Geoscience

Glenn joined our team a little over 15 years ago! Glenn worked closely in the above project with his colleague James Alderman. Glenn is a highly experienced geophysicist providing expertise in data integration and interpretation projects. His strengths are in geologically-constrained geophysical interpretation and inversion using GOCAD Mining Suite, data assessment, QA/QC and executing integrated interpretations.

Latest news

Software tips
March, 06 2020

Area-select in Viewport

In Geoscience ANALYST you can multi-select data in the Viewport to highlight them in the Data Table.
Read more
Software tips
August, 03 2020

Have you Scene this?

In GOCAD Mining Suite v19, you can save the view as a Scene by right-clicking on the 3D Viewer > (Scene) Save As…
Read more
Q&A
May, 30 2019

Q&A Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences

We had a chat with Dr. Roisin Kyne from Teck Resources and Dr. Koen Torremans from iCRAG about the importance of 3D analysis and modelling...
Read more
Software tips
August, 05 2019

Colouring histograms

In GOCAD, you can colour your histogram by object, region or property...
Read more
Software tips
October, 19 2020

Viewing data from report items

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR table and chart items from ad-hoc or scheduled reports can be easily refreshed, using the same filters that were applied in the original report, to display current data.
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
December, 01 2021

EM101: Tips and tricks for EM data in Geoscience ANALYST

In 20 minutes, James Reid show's you EM101 using Geoscience ANALYST Pro, a low-cost...
Read more
Software tips
February, 01 2019

FAQ – Can I use v18 with v17u2?

FAQ – Can I use SKUA-GOCAD 18 with GOCAD Mining Suite 17 update2? Yes, you can if you...
Read more
Software tips
July, 01 2021

Easily display a property on multiple objects

In GOCAD Mining Suite objects are grouped by the properties they contain...
Read more
Software tips
December, 16 2019

Search for data by spatial extent

This video shows you how to search for data from Geoscience INTEGRATOR by spatial extent...
Read more
Software tips
May, 06 2021

K-means clustering

In Geoscience ANALYST Pro’s v3.3, you can quickly partition your data based on the K-means clustering...
Read more
About us
November, 02 2021

What’s new in consulting services

In 2021, we have had the pleasure to start new consulting projects and add new mining companies, geological surveys, and universities to...
Read more
Software releases
September, 02 2020

A YouTube Channel about 3D modelling

We have quite a few how-to and tutorial videos lined up on YouTube highlighting our earth modelling, interpretation, and data management software for the construction of plausible geological models.
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services