Integrated interpretation, an interactive approach to forward modelling and inversion

Exploration is becoming harder, with greater focus at depth or under cover. Decisions must be made to eliminate ambiguity and maximize the benefits from various types of collected data. In terms of integrating geological and geophysical data, the essential goal is to interpret the available geophysical data based on a 3D geological model populated with physical properties. The key is to develop an understanding of the relationships between geology, geophysical responses, and rock properties. That information can then be used to create 3D geological domains with very little ancillary information, and often no drillhole data whatsoever.

Geologically-based forward modelling and inversion of geophysical data plays a vital role in quantifying these relationships, but it is important to emphasize that inversion is only one part of the interpretation process. Integrated interpretation requires an interactive approach to forward modelling and inversion. Therefore, the process demands a shift in mindset when it comes to geophysical inversion. Rather than inverting a geophysical data set once, forward modelling and inversion are performed according to the required geological hypotheses that need to be tested. Integrating geological and geophysical data, particularly in cases with limited subsurface control, also requires a practical, adaptive, and objective-driven approach to interpretation.

The following case study was developed by James Reid, Director Asia-Pacific, Consulting and Principal Geophysicist at Mira Geoscience, who worked closely with Tim Chalke and Daniel Eden on the project featured below. This case study was then presented by Glenn Pears, Principal Geophysicist at Mira Geoscience during the DMEC Exploration17 conference.

Case study:

Cave Rocks nickel and gold project area, Australia

This is a great example of producing an integrated 3D geological model based on existing geological mapping, very sparse exploration drilling, and airborne geophysical data. When tested against geophysics, the gravity, magnetics, and AEM data conflicted with the originally modelled geology. The objective was to first combine the modelled geological contact and structural surfaces, and overburden cover, in a 3D geological block model, attribute it with homogeneous properties, optimize it through inversion, and assess the computed gravity and magnetic responses.

The first impression was that the correlation between the measured and calculated responses was reasonable, but areas existed where the geophysical data conflicted with the modelled geology. The originally supplied geological information depicted the main, central fold as a south-plunging anticline, but from modelling the geophysical data, it became clear that the overall plunge direction was a north-plunging syncline. Considering that a key aim was attempting to identify the basal contact of the ultramafics, this overall change in geological understanding had a major impact on the targeting strategy and any subsequent drillhole planning. Surfaces were remodelled, the geological model was attributed with optimised homogeneous properties, and the computed response was assessed. The comparison between observed and calculated improved, particularly where the syncline plunges towards the north, as showcased in the figures below.

Figure 1: First geological model with anticline fold

Figure 2: Updated synclinal geological model.

Meet the author:

James Reid – Director Asia-Pac, Consulting and Principal Geophysicist at Mira Geoscience
James has an extensive expertise in the planning and quantitative interpretation of electromagnetic and electrical methods, particularly the application of airborne electromagnetics to mineral exploration. He has broad experience in airborne, surface, and downhole geophysics, including survey design, data acquisition, processing, and interpretation using GOCAD Mining Suite, Geoscience ANALYST, UBC-GIF, and VP Suite inversion codes.

Latest news

May, 04 2020

Sneak peek v19

Emerson-Paradigm released a short video to help users become acquainted with the redesigned interface. Watch this short video ...
Read more
Advanced geophysical interpretation, modelling and inversion
November, 03 2021

Deep Learning as an alternative to downward continuation filters for structural interpretation

Jean-Philippe Paiement proposes an alternative approach to the commonly used downward continuation filters used in the industry...
Read more
Software releases
January, 17 2025

New release – Geoscience ANALYST 4.5

Geoscience ANALYST 4.5 brings performance improvements and key new features to all modules. Download it now!
Read more
January, 05 2022

Tabular property viewer

In GOCAD Mining Suite you can view your object’s properties in a tabular format with the Tabular Property Viewer...
Read more
March, 02 2022

Filtering time-based data

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, there are various ways to filter time-based data, by shirts, property, or even day intervals...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
March, 11 2021

Peak finder – Geoscience ANALYST geoapps: Python application

Past event. Link to recording available here.
Read more
September, 07 2020

Linking viewports

In Geoscience ANALYST you can synchronize the perspective of all visible Viewports to zoom, pan, and rotate them all at once...
Read more
Mineral systems interpretation and targeting
July, 13 2022

Generating exploration models from a detailed structural interpretation and Artificial Intelligence

This approach uses the comment field of the logging table to extract general topics that can then be used as learning features in a supervised machine learning classification approach.
Read more
June, 02 2021

3D seismic data

In Geoscience ANALYST you can import and visualize 3D seismic data, and plan your next seismic survey with the seismic reflection survey designer....
Read more
August, 10 2020

Importing and visualizing VP Geophysics models

In Geoscience ANALYST v3.1, VP Model objects can now be imported by a simple drag and drop! You can then visualize the model and,...
Read more
Geoscience ANALYST
February, 10 2022

Crustal scale gravity modelling and isostatic correction over central Chile

View recording - Thomas demonstrates how to apply an isostatic correction to gravity data through a case study over central Chile using...
Read more
September, 13 2021

Manual classifications vs Project classifications

In Geoscience INTEGRATOR, There are two ways to create classifications when importing data...
Read more

Please contact our team for additional information about our products and services